The 2011 2.7GHz MacBook Pro with Intel HD 3000 integrated graphics does little or nothing to improve the 3D graphics performance compared to the GeForce 320M integrated graphics in the 2010 MacBook Air and 13" MacBook Pro. Yes, when you consider you are getting a faster CPU and much faster GPU.Ģ. Is it worth $300 more (comparably equipped). The 2011 2.2GHz and 2.3GHz MacBook Pro with Radeon 6750M graphics (1GB GDDR5) is a 'different animal' from the 2011 2.0GHz MacBook Pro with the Radeon 6490M graphics (256MB GDDR5). MBP 2.66 13" = 'md 2010' MacBook Pro Core 2 Duo 2.66GHz with integrated GeForce 320M graphicsġ. MBA 2.13 '10 = 'late 2010' MacBook Air Dual-Core 2.13GHz with integrated GeForce 320M graphics MBP 2.70 '11 = 'early 2011' MacBook Pro Dual-Core i7 2.70GHz with integrated Intel HD 3000 graphics So, my attempt at bringing new life into an old Mac Pro wasnt a complete failure. In fact, Ive decided to order an eGPU (likely the AKiTio) so that I can pair it up with a modern MacBook Pro and remove the issues of CPU bottlenecks and power delivery. MBP 2.0 '11 = 'early 2011' MacBook Pro Quad-Core i7 2.20GHz with Radeon HD 6490M graphics This is not to say that upgrading your GPU on other Mac hardware is a lost cause. MBP 2.66 '10 = 'mid 2010' MacBook Pro Dual-Core i7 2.66GHz with GeForce GT 330M graphics MBP 2.30 '11 = 'early 2011' MacBook Pro Quad-Core i7 2.30GHz with Radeon HD 6750M graphics
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |